Ten Who Care

MaryAnn Bonino‘s Chamber Music in Historic Sites brings in superb small entertainments from around the world — chamber music, early music, solo recitals — and plunks them down in enhancing architectural settings — churches, mansions, classic lobbies. You hear a Haydn quartet in the music room of, say, a Pasadena Greene Greene, and you’re finally hearing that music restored to its proper venue: a classy class act if ever one was.

Robert Cauer sells and repairs fine instruments in his shop around the corner from the Hollywood Bowl; visit as he places a precious old violin in the hands of a shiny-eyed teenager, and you‘ll know what it is to be in love with music. Cauer’s own love affair leads him to produce and publish a yearly ”Cauer Calendar“ that gathers together an entire musical season in an intelligently compiled and accurate listing of great and unique value. By doing so, he accomplishes what the rest of you all hanker for: He tells the critics where they can go.

Dean Corey took over the Philharmonic Society in sleepy, conservative, well-heeled Orange County, and invented ”Eclectic Orange,“ a few weeks of challenging musical and theatrical events from all over. The range this season, for example, is amazing, from a Mark Morris staging of a baroque opera, to the Berlin Philharmonic playing Beethoven, to the Italian pianist Marino Formenti performing Jean Barraque‘s Sonata, the Great White Shark of piano music.

Ernest Fleischmann, in 29 years as the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s executive director, reinvented the place of an orchestra in its community, as a guardian of masterpieces, a cultural force reaching out to a new audience, and a champion of new-music invention and presentation. Currently he heads the Ojai Festival, but his name is still in fine print at the Music Center, which is tantamount to burying a bomb on the premises. Strong-willed and phenomenally inventive, he proved such a hard act to follow at the Philharmonic that his successor lasted only 15 months.

Betty Freeman, a model of enlightened arts patronage, is enamored with the very act of creativity and uses her family fortune to make sure it keeps on happening, with a list of recipients (John Cage, John Adams, Virgil Thomson, you name ‘em) that stands for the thriving center of new-music activity. Uncommon among even the most enlightened patrons, she works hard to keep her name off the things she so handsomely supports.

Michael Milenski’s Long Beach Opera metamorphosed, some 20 years ago, from ordinary to extraordinary, taking on 400 years of operatic repertory and restaging each work — respectfully but with madcap originality — into something new and stimulating. Among his innovations: Monteverdi gone Mafioso and Richard Strauss‘ Elektra in a beachside motel. What’s more, they worked!

Dorrance Stalvey runs the concert programs at the County Museum with next to no budget but with a roster of participants that represents the elite of contemporary performance — including the resident California EAR Unit and major ensembles from the East Coast and beyond. His recent programming, which has included an extensive ”Focus on California“ series and the discovery of the incredible Italian pianist Marino Formenti, provides a valuable leavening to the local new-music scene.

Leonard Stein has been in on the creation of Los Angeles‘ new-music life since the 1930s: onetime assistant to Arnold Schoenberg and evangelist for his music, organizer and participant in the enterprising Piano Spheres concert series. A walking history of new-music awareness in Southern California, he can still — in his late 80s — perform Schoenberg’s piano music with an eloquence that few newcomers can match.

Steven Stucky is a composer, faculty member at Cornell, but also a frequent participant in Los Angeles musical life as the Philharmonic‘s new-music adviser and an organizer of the excellent Green Umbrella series. He sits in on the Philharmonic’s new-music planning, conducts pre-concert chats before each Umbrella concert and concocts program notes of cherishable wisdom. After all, with a name like Stucky, he has to be good.

Jim Svejda is planner and host (eloquent, controversial) of the evening classical-music programs on KUSC and, in that sea of blandness, an island of awareness that music can be listened to for intellectual pleasure, not merely as a branch of the wallpaper industry. Driven by deep but interesting prejudices, especially in favor of his Czech countrymen, his is one of the last radio voices around that make one believe he really loves the stuff.

–A.R.

Posted in A Little Night Music | Comments Off on Ten Who Care

The Difference

It didn‘t take too much gift of prophecy to recognize the fates that brought Esa-Pekka Salonen and the Los Angeles Philharmonic to a merger of their destinies. People still talk about his debut here (November 29, 1984) — a fair-haired conqueror from an exotic land, bearing an abrasive new hitherto-unknown symphony (the Lutoslawski Third). Credit Ernest Fleischmann — who ”just happened“ to be in London when Salonen ”just happened“ to be available to stand in for the ailing Michael Tilson Thomas — for his accustomed skill at fate-twisting to transform Salonen’s one-shot triumph into a fully realized career.

You need some history to realize the extent of Salonen‘s accomplishment as he begins his 10th year as music director. He took on an orchestra demoralized after the fiasco of the Andre Previn years, in a city that had to be taught all over again to care about its cultural amenities. The boyish good looks helped, but the musical qualities helped even more. Not every orchestra member was immediately pleased — the stick technique took getting used to; so did the strictly business rehearsal manner; so, of course, did some of the repertory choices. When the New York reviews came in after the touring began, and when the recording engineers from Sony came to call, Los Angeles became sold on its newly acquired treasure.

Salonen’s success here has registered with the folks back home as well. If nobody paid much attention to the musical life around the Baltic — Finland, mostly, but Estonia not far behind — they do now. At the very time when the old middle-European ways seem at their dreariest — as witness the conductor situation with East Coast and Midwest orchestras — here come the blond Baltics with their funny names and their dazzling music making: Salonen first, closely followed by the likes of Saraste, Mustonen, Hynninen, Lindberg and who‘s that new guy in Minneapolis? I asked Salonen recently about this sudden invasion from the North.

”There are several explanations,“ he said, ”each of them rather simple. The Finnish government established a system of communal music schools about 30 years ago, and this is now the harvesting time. Every little town has a music school; if a student can’t pay tuition or buy an instrument, those are provided free. A capable student moves on from the small music school to a bigger one. The best are taken to the Sibelius Academy in Helsinki. Whatever quality there is, is found; you can‘t hide talent.

“Then there is this matter of Sibelius. For 600 years, Finland was under Swedish rule, and the Finnish language was spoken only by peasants. From 1809, under Russian rule, the Finnish identity was even more endangered. In came Sibelius. He spoke Swedish, but he was chasing a girl whose parents were fanatical Finnish speakers, so he learned Finnish. He composed, and the patriotic messages in Finlandia and the Second Symphony became symbols of a Finnish identity. The Russians could cross out dangerous lines in political writing, but you can’t censor musical phrases. Sibelius became a monument, which killed his creativity but gave birth to his country. Finland‘s classical music has always been the best way to tell the world we exist.”

Posted in A Little Night Music | Comments Off on The Difference

Answering Back

Large events demand large gestures. At the Hollywood Bowl, where Wynton Marsalis’ “joyous, affirmative” All Rise was already on the schedule, some oratory by Marsalis and Esa-Pekka Salonen refocused the work as a response to the horrible tragedies of two days before. The Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra rushed the Beethoven “Eroica” onto its opening program. The New York Philharmonic scheduled the Brahms Requiem onto its nationwide telecast, turning it into Dead From Lincoln Center, where a re-assertion of life might have been preferable. At the Bowl, at the Opera, probably at all public events, the moment of silence followed by “The Star-Spangled Banner” in full solemnity was the order of the day, and the more singable “God Bless America” has also been taken on as surrogate anthem.

Marsalis‘ two-hour oratorio, which calls for vocal soloists, chorus, jazz ensemble and symphony orchestra, was commissioned by the New York Philharmonic and performed by them two years ago. It came here because here is where Sony has been recording it — possibly on the money it saved by dropping its complete-works-of-Ligeti project midway. Its ancestry, writes Marsalis in a program note, is the blues; to prove its kinship to that powerful, assertive 12-bar musical form, it contains 12 movements. (Shakespeare’s Fluellen, that avatar of everything pedantic, proves the relationship between Henry V and Alexander the Great by pointing out that both were born in states containing rivers.)

Nothing I know claiming a blues background, not even Gershwin‘s Rhapsody, strays so far and so aimlessly from its source as the excruciatingly ponderous wanderings in this piece. If you watched Marsalis in his slick, cliche-ridden contributions to the Ken Burns jazz documentary on PBS, perhaps the pretensions of All Rise won’t surprise you. Marsalis is an exciting jazz trumpeter, and it‘s strange that his new piece accords him so little time in the spotlight. Most of the time, instead, we are confronted with his other side, the o’erleaping ambitions (Shakespeare, again) of the multifaceted public image he has created for himself. He was also, once, an exciting presenter of music for young audiences, and evidence of his good works exists on videos.

But his talents stop short of omnipotence, and the churnings and posturings in this latest work, the self-conscious extensions of uninteresting material, prolong what might have worked in 20 minutes into two-plus hours of racking boredom. I hate to invoke odious similarities, but the work I kept thinking about during this long, painful evening was Leonard Bernstein‘s Mass. At least Marsalis was savvy enough to end the piece with a rooty-tooty gospel number that invites the audience to hand-clap along and then to keep on clapping. That’s show biz for you. And the rules of show biz also compel me to note that participants in the event included Marsalis‘ Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra, the Morgan State University Choir, and several choruses from Cal State Northridge under Dr. Paul Smith. A fine, dark-voiced contralto named Cynthia Hardy deserved far more solo passages than she was allotted. Salonen and the Philharmonic did what they had to, but left me with suspicions that the weight of the huge orchestra — for all the “masterpiece” aura it contributed — was exactly what was wrong with the piece, that a lot less might have been a lot more.

The Chamber Orchestra’s opening-night program began delightfully, if that‘s the right word: Jeffrey Kahane and Lang Lang launching into “The Star-Spangled Banner” as a piano duet with the orchestra joining in. This led to Samuel Barber’s Adagio for Strings, played as movingly as I can ever remember, with the harrowing beauty of its long interwoven melodic lines extending toward infinity and the audience observing the requested silence. There followed a brief Kahane solo, an improv on “America, the Beautiful” that gave shape to this small, elegant celebration. At concert‘s end there was Kahane’s take on the “Eroica”: brash, somewhat short of breath, the angry thrusts in the “Funeral March” quite dazzling, some of the rest — the onrush of dissonance in the first movement and the resolution later in that movement — blurred by excessive speeds and some balance problems that allowed horns and bassoons to overpower the rest of the ensemble.

In between came Lang Lang and Chopin‘s E-Minor Concerto, music of consummate prettiness that can become a gooey mess if played merely correctly. Not so this young (19) Chinese phenom, who not only played the bejesus out of the music but acted it out as well. I am not always a devotee of excessive calisthenics by performing artists at work, and you can check me out on the subject in my files on Olli Mustonen, among others. Yet I got the sense from this immensely talented youngster that he not only knows his Chopin backward and forward, but also knows how silly some of it can be. He played the work marvelously, with great regard for its broad tunes and for spaces in between, but played it also as if sharing a splendid joke with all of us out front. The crowd loved it, I loved it, and at the end everybody seemed to know that the only possible encore would be a 50-finger transcription of “The Stars and Stripes Forever.” That’s what we got. Woo-eee!

If the recent disasters kept you from flying up for the San Francisco Opera‘s Arshak II, count your blessings. Aside from the questionable circumstance of an outside group buying its way onto a tax-supported stage — the well-heeled Armenian community nationwide, which pungled up a seven-figure sum to persuade the departing general manager, Lotfi Mansouri, to stage this opera of dubious provenance — the other question must also be asked: Confronted with this piece of tepid Italianate factory-made note-spinning from 1868, without even any Armenian identity in its music, who could have seen the work as stage-worthy for one of this country’s most distinguished companies? If this is the bundle Mansouri left on his successor‘s doorstep, he needs to answer to Sanitation.

The composer, Tigran Chukhadjian, composed the opera as Arsace II, to an Italian libretto; its central figure is, indeed, Armenia’s fourth-century tyrant leader, and the plot concerns his overthrow. In 1998 a Chukhadjian research center in Paris got Mansouri to commission an Armenian translation of the original Italian, an act comparable, say, to translating Verdi‘s Nabucco into Babylonian. This new translation is the commodity touted as a “world premiere” by the San Francisco Opera. (There is, actually, another Armenian-language version, created by Soviet Armenians and still performed in Yerevan and other cities; it turns the villain Arshak into a Stalinesque superhero.)

That’s more than you want to know, I‘ll bet, about ArsaceArshak II, except to note that 1868, the year of its composition, was also the year of Boris Godunov. Priorities?

Posted in A Little Night Music | Comments Off on Answering Back

REVISE

In the summer of 1979, in a madcap decision that I still don’t regret, I succumbed to the urge to go bicoastal. (The term, I think, had just been invented.) New York Magazine, whose music critic I had been from its founding, had just cloned itself on the West Coast, and I thought it might be interesting to cover – and, perhaps,  even compare – the musical life on both coasts; the plan was to commute for a year and then turn the Western territory over to an eager recruit and return to the relative sanity of a power job in the seat of all power.
It’s twenty-two years later. The aforementioned clone is now a distant memory,  but I long ago accepted the reality of myself as a dug-in resident of the West Coast. That’s okay as long as I have the carfare for an occasional visit back to the real world past the mountains. Friends on both coasts still ask: what do I miss the most.  My only answer strikes me as somewhat superficial. I miss the energy around  a New York performance: getting there by bus or subway or on foot, finding some acceptable food within a block or two, hanging around to schmooze over a drink or coffee afterwards. You can’t do that here.
The comparisons are, indeed, deep-seated and fascinating. In California people drive their cars to concerts, park close to the halls in relatively cheap (by New York standards, at least), accessible garages. After concerts or operas, they drive straight home; late-night dining, where people gather and discuss the music they’d just heard, was then, and is now, an arcane practice. The benign climate has an interesting effect on the way people dress for musical events. Even on classier occasions – an operatic opening night, a symphony-orchestra benefit – you can always spot a sport jacket or two amid the black ties, perhaps even a patch of denim.
I find this agreeable. The way the casualness infiltrates some of the music-making also makes its points. The phenomenon of the Hollywood Bowl, the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s famous cash cow and local landmark, probably couldn’t be duplicated anywhere else on earth. The fare:  eleven weeks of concerts, from July to mid-September, with two programs a week given over to substantial classical repertory, one program of showtunes and lighter classics, given twice to near-capacity crowds often culminating in a sensational fireworks display, a jazz night and other programs ranging from full-length opera to third-world folk – all in a space whose 18,000 seats are filled as often as not — in an outdoor area for dining in styles ranging from Glyndebourne to Yankee Stadium. Again, the benign climate makes it possible; in my 22 years here I remember only one rainout.
And this all takes place, mind you,  not in the sylvan reaches of a West-Coast Tanglewood, but in an urban enclave easily reachable by car or public transit, walking distance from, say, Grauman’s “Chinese” Theater with its famous footprints, not far from where major freeways intersect. There are things wrong with Hollywood Bowl, as the more curmudgeonly of local critics sometimes delight in pointing out. A wine bottle will sometime roll down a concrete stairway; an LAPD  ‘copter  will intrude overhead. You couldn’t mistake the ambiance for an all-Beethoven night at Carnegie Hall, or at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion of the Los Angeles Music Center for that matter, but the fact remains that Beethoven nights (or Tchaikovsky, or Rachmaninoff) at the Hollywood Bowl can draw an audience the size of four Carnegies – even more when the program includes, as it often does, a dramatization of the “Battle Symphony” complete with marching bands and fireworks.
I decided to remain.
SPACE
The Continental Divide is an invisible line that snakes across Rocky Mountain peaks, south through American deserts and into Mexico. On one side of the line, rivers flow east toward the Mississippi and beyond; on the other, they head toward the Pacific. Something similar to this dividing line, if not so exactly positioned, exists in music as well. There is New York, facing (or, perhaps, glaring) eastward toward Europe, its musical history firmly implanted and  its outlooks shaped by the European generations from Charles Pachelbel (son on the Canon guy, who organized concerts of  chamber music in Lower Manhattan in 1736) to Kurt Masur, (who performed Beethoven only yesterday). There is California, facing west, its major composers as likely inspired by the exotic scales and rituals of Japan and Indonesia as by the academic precepts carried in across the  Europeans who braved the Sierra barrier. You can still, of course, invoke a time when California’s musical roster numbered such notable Old Country expatriates as Arnold Schoenberg and Igor Stravinsky. Yet two of the West’s most indigenous creative spirits – the Los Angeles-born John Cage and Oregon’s Lou Harrison – studied briefly with Schoenberg and then rejected everything he had taught them.
California’s music began to shake itself free from old-masterdom on the day in 1912 when the 15-year-old Henry Cowell scandalized a San Francisco audience with his music that involved whomping down on a keyboard with full forearm or fists. Not much later, Cowell proclaimed the one uniquely Californian message: forget Europe, forget sonata form and tonal structures and all that classical history. At Cowell’s urging, Harrison and Cage  rummaged around in San Francisco junkyards to find new kinds of resonance: brake drums and old trolley-car springs that could be grouped into percussion orchestras. Even as California became home for great Europeans chased from their native lands by Nazi ideologies, California’s musical originals stood firm.
Something of that cussedness, that sense of freedom, abides. It is the spirit behind a remarkable educational project – funded, would you believe, by Walt Disney out of his long-standing secret passion for creative originality. Founded in 1971 on what was then an isolated hilltop in the middle of nowhere – suburbia, alas, has caught up – the California Institute of the Arts (aka CalArts) guides its students through the brand-new mysteries of electronic music, multimedia blendings of sound and video and, above all, the interweave of Third-World, Pacific Rim and you-name-it into a new, composite musical language. To the south, the San Diego branch of the University of California has, at one time or another, encouraged young composers to fashion serious new music out of natural sounds – waves crashing on the Pacific shore, a gurgling stream in the  Sierra.
That need to challenge the accepted definitions, to astonish, to move far afield – that spirit that was born with Cowell and Cage  and lives on in Lou Harrison – remains the prime spirit in California music. It’s the spirit that moved a gathering of young composers up north, in the early 1960s,  to form the San Francisco Tape Music Center, to explore the complex possibilities of the newly-devised electronic apparatus and to see how it might translate into genuine music. One member, the young Terry Riley, dreamed up a piece, which he called In C, where any number of players could follow its small, repetitive patterns any number of times and transport an audience into something close to a trance state.  From In C came the music we know as “minimalism.” One of its most successful practitioners, John Adams, was moved to migrate  to California from his native New England after reading the writings of John Cage, thus bringing the California spirit around full circle.
And yet…when one of Adams’ most ingratiating works, the burbling, euphoric Grand Pianola Music had its New York premiere in 1983, you couldn’t hear the music for the booing. If there’s any shape to the musical divide, it’s the obsession in New York’s musical circles to take its serious music seriously. Is it a matter of crowding? The tensions in the ongoing battle on either side of the Fourteenth Street dividing line? The surfeit of critics, some of them employed on make-or-break publications, that stills the creative impulse and strikes fear? Morton Subotnick, electronic guru and one of the founders of both the San Francisco Tape Music Center and CalArts, put it this way not long ago. “It’s easier to try to be original in California,” he said, “because nothing out here matters.”
SPACE
Something out here, however, matters a lot. Behind the cutting edge, there is a solid musical structure that seems to expand exponentially – like the creeping urbanization that bids fair to transform the entire coastline into a single mall, but far more rewarding. At the northern end there is Seattle, home of strong lumberjacks and stronger coffee, now also metamorphosing into an American Bayreuth with its hot-ticket stagings of the Ring cycle. At the southern end, an hour south of Los Angeles,  there is the extraordinary rebirth of Orange County, long the butt of right-wing japes, now harboring the high-adventure “Eclectic Orange” festival plus a splendidly born-again opera company. In between there is the rejuvenated San Francisco Symphony under the exuberant leadership of Michael Tilson Thomas – an extraordinary and rare instance of the exactly right fellow in the right job in the right place. Across the street there is the San Francisco Opera, probably the most traditional of all West-Coast musical amenities, but now headed for an interesting shakeup under new management. And then there is Los Angeles.
“What could you find to do there, in that cultural desert?” my New York friends asked when I made my foolhardy move 22 years ago. As they asked, the great Carlo Maria Giulini had taken over leadership of the Los Angeles Philharmonic, offering music-making of legendary eloquence at the time when his predecessor,  Zubin Mehta was launched into alienating most of New York. Giulini’s stay was short, but it served to awaken Los Angeles to what it meant to have a major orchestra in its midst. Ernest Fleischmann, the Philharmonic’s general director of comparably legendary status, guided his audiences as well toward the new-music adventuring in the energetic “Green Umbrella” series, chamber-orchestra performances of cutting-edge repertory. While the New York Philharmonic’s similar series, “Horizons,” petered out after a couple of years, the “Green Umbrella,” at 20, still sells out most of the time.  Now, too, there is a Los Angeles Opera worth taking seriously; I write these words still aglow from the start of the company’s 16th season, its first under the leadership of Plácido Domingo.
All these adornments to the West Coast cultural life have their counterparts back East, to be sure. You can hear Plácido, after all, in practically every opera house in the world; there are major symphonies in every city on the map. Yet there is something out West that matters. New York’s musical calendar is so crowded that it doesn’t really matter that its Philharmonic signs on the aging and not-very-important Loren Maazel; people will wait for some other orchestra to come to town and just go there instead.
In San Francisco and Los Angeles, that condition hasn’t set in. Perhaps it will in another fifty years, but for now Esa-Pekka Salonen matters a great deal to Los Angeles, and Michael Tilson Thomas to San Francisco. In Long Beach, down the coast from Los Angeles, there’s a shoestring opera company that has earned a loyal following for productions that shouldn’t pan out as well as they do, but always do – Elektra in a Malibu beach house, most recently. Up in the hills near Santa Barbara, an easy hour’s drive from Los Angeles, the little Ojai Festival has been doing sell-out business for over half a century, making music in a bandstand in a park. The music is, and always has been, new; Ojai’s gods are Boulez, Stravinsky, Copland, even Cage. It thrives because its music-making is so good, but that’s not always enough to keep an enterprise afloat. It thrives, because people have learned to care – enough to endure rough park benches and noisy crickets and insistent birds – enough, just so there’s music.

Posted in Musical America | Comments Off on REVISE

BILLY BUDD REVIEW (aka This Budd’s for You)

“Billy Budd” was the appropriate finale for the Los Angeles Opera’s 14th season, a reminder that of all repertories sampled by departing founder and general director Peter Hemmings during his tenure, the operas of Benjamin Britten have consistently earned highest acclaim. This was the fourth work to be heard; “Peter Grimes,” scheduled for next October, will extend the list. “Billy Budd” runs at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion through June 17
History abounds. The Billy is Rodney Gilfry, who has come far since he sang the Herald in the company’s inaugural “Otello” in October, ’86; much of his rise has been nurtured by Hemmings’ benevolent regard for young artists. Roderick Brydon is on the podium, as he has been for nearly all the company’s Britten ventures. (Robert Duerr led the “Midsummer Night’s Dream” the first time around; Brydon, the revival.) The production,  from London’s Royal Opera, is directed by Francesca Zambello, also now an international celebrity, whose off-the-wall “Les Troyens” for Hemmings in ’91 was one of the company’s most illustrious fiascos. And Richard Stilwell, the Billy in the Metropolitan Opera’s premiere in ’78, is on hand in Los Angeles, older and wiser, as First Lieutenant Redburn.
All told, L.A.’s “Billy Budd” constitutes a distinguished sendoff, both for Hemmings (who returns to the England he never really abandoned at least in spirit) and for the company’s  1999/2000 season, a bumpy journey for the most part. Alison Chitty’s stage designs nearly steal the show; the several decks of Herman Melville’s “HMS Indomitable” rise and fall, opening vistas of endless starry skies at one point, and crowding down onto the climactic scene of murder and recrimination as if to trap its principals – the saintly Billy, the insanely lovelorn Master-at-Arms  Claggart and the benevolent but catatonic Captain Vere — in a psychological prison of their own making.
The stage designs capture as well the multileveled symbolism of Melville’s parable, over which scholars will forever haggle. E.M. Forster’s libretto, while taming some of Melville’s visionary prose, neatly touches up its unspoken homoerotic undercurrents. (The similarity to Thomas Mann’s “Death in Venice,” which Britten also successfully set as his final opera, is made inescapable in Forster’s prose setting.) Similarly, Zambello’s propensity for freeze-framing Rodney Gilfry’s Billy in a succession of tableaux worthy of any Sunday-school calendar, turned celestial in Alan Burrett’s ecstatic lighting, gaudily highlights another of the fable’s disturbing, captivating undercurrents.
Gilfry now owns the role of Billy worldwide: brilliantly in command of the clear, poignant eloquence for the final haunting ballad, as well as the physical ease in climbing foretops and ladders. As his antagonist and ultimate victim, Jeffrey Wells creates a hulking, horrific Claggart; Robert Tear’s Captain is exactly right in its tone of incertitude blended into nobility. The great “Billy Budd” performances – the John Dexter staging at the Met, for one – triumph ultimately in their creation of a taut, rough-edged, howling ensemble out of a huge all-male cast whose dark tone colors are furthered by the pounding drums and brass of the orchestra. Peter Hemmings’ song of farewell belongs in this company.

Posted in Musical America | Comments Off on BILLY BUDD REVIEW (aka This Budd’s for You)

LOS ANGELES OPERA OPENING

Nobody has ever suggested that running an opera company – let alone two companies the width of  a continent apart – might be for Plácido Domingo an easygoing diversion. Nobody need be all that startled, therefore, at the few dark rumblings around the edges of the glory at the start of the Domingo era at the Los Angeles Opera. True, the two operas that inaugurated that era – the company’s first-ever Pique Dame on September 4 and Lohengrin eleven days later – did indeed rank as spectacular achievements, as fine as anything in recent memory on the Music Center’s Dorothy Chandler Pavilion stage. Yet, there were rumblings.

On September 9 the London Sunday Times ran a doom’n’gloom article on the company’s financial woes, specifically on the enormous outlay – some $45 million, it was intimated – it would take to realize Domingo’s dream project, the George Lucas-designed Ring slated for the 2003/04 season. The company’s directors, the article claimed, were up in arms, a not unfamiliar stance by the famously conservative Board. “Nonsense,” responded a company spokesman in a protesting letter, but three days later another bomb was dropped, the resignation of executive director Ian White-Thomson after only a year on the job. Against this background, the New York tragedy and its aftermath had cast a further shadow, obliging the company to shuffle and reschedule. The first Lohengrin, scheduled for a black-tie premiere on September 12, was  pushed forward to a dress-Californian matinee on the  15th.

Even so, the shape of the company’s triumphant rebirth was easy to discern. In the fifteen years of Peter Hemmings’ leadership there had been no Russian-language opera. (A Pique Dame had been announced for 1990 but dropped.) Aside from a Tristan memorable more for the David Hockney designs than on musical grounds and Julie Taymor’s gimmicky Dutchman, Wagner had been given short shrift. Several of Hemmings’ bravest ventures had been undercut by impoverished leadership from the podium.  Here, then, was a new beginning in which three previous major deficiencies were dramatically erased. The best news of all was that the two conductors involved – Valery Gergiev and Kent Nagano – now have long-term commitments to the company: Gergiev for an annual visit, Nagano in the newly created post of Principal Conductor.

Domingo’s madman-hero was familiar coin from the Met’s Pique Dame of 1999; so was Gergiev’s urgent, fiery leadership. (Gegam Gregorian – the Gherman on the Gergiev-led video of the opera — assumed the role in later performances; Gianandrea Noseda took over the podium.)  On opening night Domingo’s  60-year-old pipes were still in remarkable condition, his stage presence the woolly-bear galumphing that passes for acting throughout his vast repertory. Galina Gorchakova was his Lisa as at the Met, impassioned if somewhat soft of voice. Sergei Leiferkus was the robust Tomsky; Vladimir Chernov, the Yeletzky; Susanna Poretzky, winner of one of Domingo’s recent “Operalia” competitions, had her few lustrous moments as Pauline. The evening’s loudest cheers, however, rang for the 64-year-old Elena Obraztsova as the Countess; in the role in all opera with the fewest notes and the most powerful impact, just the sound of her dropped cane in the silence surrounding her death haunts the memory.

German designer/director Gottfried Pilz dispensed with Tchaikovskys scenic suggestions and devised instead a single performing space, a huge room raked left to right serving as park, ballroom, bedroom and gaming house, with a dark space down front that served as a kind of limbo for the madman-hero to contemplate his demons. Everything moved, often feverishly; more than once a chorus burst into the scene like a flood from a broken dam. More than once, also, another kind of deluge – the insistent onrush of dark resonance from the orchestra under Gergiev – left little chance to catch one’s breath, on stage or out front.

A closer rapport with the neighboring movie industry is also on Domingo’s promised agenda; to that end the grand old Maximilian Schell came on to stage the company’s first Lohengrin. With set designs based on paintings that the late Yevgeny Lysyk had originally created for the Mariinsky – including an extraordinary Act Two backdrop like a dozen Cologne Cathedrals interwoven – Schell came up with a conception timeless in the best sense. A huge sculpture, a kind of winged obelisk, served as both Swan and Tree of Wisdom, wondrously lit by Alan Burrett’s stark searchlights at the end as the lost prince Gottfried emerged from its folds. Dirk Hofacker’s costumes were of no time and all time: soldiers’ helmets out of World War I, swords and shields out of Van Eyck, Elsa in a nightie worthy of Dior. The opera was given virtually uncut, minus one short scene for Elsa near the end. The splendor and shimmer of Kent Nagano’s orchestra and the sturdy rightness of his pacing made the minutes whiz past.

Sweden’s Gösta Winbergh was the Lohengrin, his tone steely and commanding at first, softening down to a most appealing tenderness later on. Canadian soprano Adrianne Pieczonka was the endearing Elsa, again spanning a wonderful range from the dreamy “Euch, Luften”  to her insistent cajoling in the Bridal Chamber scene that brings on her downfall. Tom Fox’s Telramund exuded his usual masterful menace.  Eva Marton’s Ortrud was the one major disappointment, not the stipulated mezzo-soprano with her death-dealing tones of darkness and thrust, but an aging soprano scooping her way toward pitches she can no longer command. Lucinda Childs – Einstein on the Beach, remember?  — was credited with the “choreography”: not so much “ballet” as an imaginative stylization of slow moving, especially among Elsa’s entourage. This was one more remarkable aspect in an over-all conception that generated marvelous refreshment for the eye and the ear. Mark it, then, as a giant step upward for opera in Los Angeles… something beyond price-tag.

Posted in Opera News | Comments Off on LOS ANGELES OPERA OPENING

Off and Running, Maybe

Photo by Ken Howard

Nobody said it would be easy. Barely into its season of reincarnation, the L.A. Opera has already found its path strewn with boulders. The New York tragedy contributed; the Lohengrin opening, on the Wednesday after the Tuesday, had to be postponed. (A makeup performance is scheduled for October 1.) The opera’s conductor, Kent Nagano, whose appearance signals a new era in which strong conducting assumes a higher priority than before, was marooned in Germany. His return in time for the second Lohengrin – which in the light of shuffled schedules had become the premiere – was accomplished via a hairbreadth flight to Mexico before arriving in town.

The other glitch in the opening-week festivities may take longer to untangle. The September 9 London Sunday Times carried a scattershot end-of-the-world piece to the effect that the Los Angeles Opera was in the process of self-immolation. The blame, claimed the L.A.-based writer John Harlow, fell largely on Plácido Domingo’s extravagant planning – most of all the George Lucas–designed Ring, which Harlow pegged as bankrolled at some $45 million, twice the whole of last season’s revenue – and that board members were up in arms. An answering letter from the L.A. Opera’s publicist poked the article full of holes, yet later that same week the company’s executive director, Ian White-Thomson, sent in his resignation after little more than a year on the job. The board chairman, Leonard Green, will hold the fort while the search goes forward for a replacement, but the company’s history since Peter Hemmings’ early days has been a pitched battle between management’s adventure and the board’s parsimony. I can only pray that board members can be otherwise entertained on the Moses und Aron night.

Meanwhile, we’ve had terrific opera these past couple of weeks: terrific performances and also terrific forward steps in mending some of the holes in previous seasons’ programming. Both operas – the opening-night Queen of Spades and the ensuing Lohengrin – were endowed with leadership from the podium stronger than anything I can remember since the Simon Rattle Wozzeck or the Salonen Pelléas. What’s more, both conductors – Valery Gergiev and Kent Nagano – bear long-term commitments to the company. The Queen of Spades represented the company’s first-ever and long-overdue venture into the Russian-language repertory; the Lohengrin was only the company’s third Wagnerian enterprise in 15 years. Somebody at the drawing board apparently knows where to put the dots.

The Queen of Spades had been promised once before, in 1990, but was canceled in favor of Verdi’s Don Carlo with Domingo plus an otherwise forgettable, mostly Russian cast. Of the two Tchaikovsky operas that linger in the repertory, Eugene Onegin may be the more digestible for its thread of human-size emotion; The Queen is by some odds the more powerful and complex. The opera dates from the time of the Fifth Symphony; its music has that work’s deep mellowness from clarinets and horns. There is also, surprisingly and delightfully, quite a lot of Mozart, in masterful pastiche: the long orchestral prelude to Act 2, and the ensuing delicious, lightweight pastorale. Between those moments and the others where the hero’s madness drives the music toward dissonance and grinding counterpoints, this opera may be Tchaikovsky’s most daring score.

And “daring” is, as well, the word for the treatment accorded the work. German designer-director Gottfried Pilz dispenses with the libretto’s scenic suggestions. Pilz has instead created a single performing space, a huge room raked from right to left, dominated overhead by a huge crystal chandelier. A dark area down front at stage level serves as a kind of limbo where the madman-hero Herman, a mere wraith in the darkness, contemplates his demons. The one space serves as park, ballroom, the Countess’ bedroom and – with shadows eerily projected onto the rear wall – gaming house. Everything moves, usually at feverish pace; more than once a chorus bursts into the scene like a flood from a broken dam; the crowds literally dance to Gustavo Llano’s whirlwind choreography.

And so does the opera itself, under Gergiev’s propulsive leadership, with the frazzled bedazzlement of Plácido Domingo’s Herman, his 60-year-old pipes in near-pristine estate. Russian soprano Galina Gorchakova, her smallish voice nicely colored toward the dark side, was the touching Lisa; mezzo-soprano Susanna Poretsky, a recent winner in the Domingo-sponsored Operalia competition, offered a charming take on her one big aria. The evening’s loudest, longest cheers, however, went to the veteran Elena Obraztsova, who had little actually to sing about but whose silent enactment of her moment of death – punctuated in Pilz’s production only by the fall of her cane onto the resonant floor – was one of the evening’s breath-stopping moments.

The soft shimmer of Lohengrin‘s opening A-major chord filled the house last Saturday with comfort and promise. Amazement was in the air. I have to go back one more time (at least) to see the magic of Alan Burrett’s soft gray-to-violet lighting across Maximilian Schell’s dynamic chorus groupings in the first act, the collage of Yevgeny Lysyk’s paintings of Gothic architecture projected across the whole stage – like a dozen Cologne Cathedrals interwoven – in the second act; the Act 3 soldiers with their strange but effective see-through cloaks and shields that allowed the eerie gray lighting to flood the stage with passion and menace near the end. I wasn’t sure about Nagano’s Wagnerian identity, but I needn’t have worried. This was the sound of Romantic Wagner: resonant, beautifully balanced, even to the great squashy mass of offstage brass tone here and there, and – alas, for those given to a posteriori judgments – uncut and splendidly broad.

Sweden’s Gösta Winbergh was the Lohengrin, his tone steely and commanding at first, softening down to a most appealing tenderness later on. Canadian soprano Adrianne Pieczonka’s Elsa was as endearing as any I can remember, again spanning a wonderful range, from the dreamy “Song to the Breezes” to the nagging insistence in the “Bridal Chamber” scene that brings on her downfall. Tom Fox’s Telramund exuded his usual gut-twisting menace. Eva Marton’s Ortrud was the one major disappointment, not the stipulated mezzo-soprano with her death-dealing tones of darkness and thrust, but an aging soprano scooping her way toward pitches she can no longer command. Lucinda Childs — Einstein on the Beach, remember? – was credited with the “choreography.” That didn’t exactly mean “ballet” this time, but rather an imaginative stylization of slow moving, especially among Elsa’s entourage. This was one more remarkable aspect in an overall conception that generated marvelous refreshment for the eye and the ear. It appears that local opera has finally achieved its deserved firm foundation. And that, good friends of opera, is something beyond price tag.

Posted in A Little Night Music | Comments Off on Off and Running, Maybe

LOHENGRIN REVIEW

If anyone ever advised Plácido Domingo that running an opera company might be an easy and well-oiled undertaking, last week’s events around his West Coast branch – also known as Los Angeles Opera – were surely enough to set him straight. His new season, his first actually as the company’s head and decision-maker, began smoothly enough, with the triumphant Pique Dame as previously noted. Then the skies opened.
On September 9 the London Sunday Times ran a doom’n’gloom article about the company’s future, citing unrest among the notoriously parsimonious board of directors over Domingo’s exuberant spending – specifically the George Lucas–designed Ring slated for 2003 and rumored with a $45 million budget encumbrance. “Not true,” responded a company spokesman, but the clouds thickened the following Wednesday  with the sudden resignation of executive director Ian White-Thomson after little more than a year on the job.
That act was curiously timed; it came a day after New York City’s terrorist attack, whose impact included a wholesale shuffling of performing schedules worldwide. The company’s first Lohengrin was scheduled for that Wednesday but cancelled; Kent Nagano, the company’s incoming principal conductor, was marooned in Berlin. By Saturday, when the Lohengrin actually took place, Nagano had made his way back to Los Angeles in a zigzag trajectory by plane and car, and the opera company’s board chairman had picked up the dropped reins pending a search for a replacement.
Eventually, however, the skies cleared; the new Lohengrin – only the third Wagnerian foray in the company’s 16 years –also became its first real triumph in that repertory. The best news of all was that the glory belonged in large measure to Nagano’s firm hand in his newly created post. Wagner’s music had previously been accorded short shrift in the local repertory, and the lack of a firm conducting hand had frequently foredoomed some of the best-intended productions in the past. Both problems have been resonantly renounced in the company’s first mountings in the new Placido Domingo regime.

Everything worked. Immensely aided by Alan Burrett’s stark, intense lighting, In his company debut, actor/stage director Maximilian Schell deployed his onstage forces in a a mounting dramatic line of terror, menace and ultimate redemption. Painter Yevgeny Lysyk’s projected designs, seen previously at St. Petersburg’s Mariinsky Theater, created a haunting if eclectic atmosphere, medieval with arresting contemporary overtones, as if half a dozen Cologne Cathedral facades had somehow become woven into a neon factory. Lohengrin’s famous Swan, a stumbling block to many stage designers in the past, this time took the form of a gigantic birdlike construction midstage, bathed in fantastical, dazzling light.
Swedish tenor Gosta Winbergh was the Lohengrin, clarion-voiced and acceptably heroic in stature; Canadian soprano Adrianne Pieczonka was an Elsa of heartbreaking purity and melancholy; as Telramund, baritone Tom Fox added one more item to his impressive scrapbook of villains. Only the veteran Eva Marton, an aging soprano cast in a role where the dark menace of a true mezzo-soprano is ordained, seemed outclassed by her writhing, slithering music.
It didn’t take much beyond the first shimmering chords of Wagner’s much-beloved opera to sense the company launched into a new era in orchestral discipline and tone control. Throughout the famously broad and eloquent – if occasionally posterior-threatening –  expanse of Wagnerian rhetoric the strength of Nagano’s command was clearly apparent. At the final curtain calls, even among the generally splendid singers and the beaming Max Schell, Nagano earned  — and deserved –  the most tumultuous cheers.

Posted in Musical America | Comments Off on LOHENGRIN REVIEW

Pick Dam

The Placido Domingo era at the Los Angeles Opera got off to a sensational start this week, and how! In press conference after press conference, the incoming artistic director/tenorissimo had promised that attention would be paid in areas where scant attention formerly existed. The opening-night “Pique Dame” marked the start of the fulfillment of those promises – in, as they say, spades.
It was, for one thing, the company’s first-ever dip into Russian opera. This has been accomplished now in high style, under the probing, propulsive baton of migratory Russian superconductor Valery Gergiev and with a mostly-Russian cast. The innovative German director/designer Gottfried Pilz has come on in both capacities, to design and execute a terrific piece of contemporary musical theater. All that bodes well for the future of opera in Los Angeles; neither strong conducting nor daring stagecraft had hitherto been the norm under Peter Hemmings’ cautious leadership.
And “daring” is, indeed, the word for the treatment accorded the work before a cheering full house on Tuesday. Gottfried Pilz dispenses with the libretto’s scenic suggestions (which are, by the way, nicely fulfilled in the video of the opera from the St. Petersburg Kirov, also under Gergiev). He has, instead, created a single performing space, a huge room raked from right to left, dominated overhead by a huge crystal chandelier. A dark area down front at stage level serves as a kind of limbo where the hero, a mere wraith in the darkness, contemplates his personal demons and eavesdrops on everyone else. The one main space serves as park, ballroom, the Countess’ bedroom and – with shadows eerily projected onto the rear wall — gaming house. Everything moves, usually at feverish pace; more than once a chorus bursts into the scene like a flood from a broken dam; the crowds literally dance to Gustavo Llano’s whirlwind choreography.
And so, in fact, does the opera itself, under Gergiev’s propulsive leadership, with the frazzled bedazzlement of Domingo’s 60-year-old pipes in near-pristine condition. Russian soprano Galina Gorchakova, her smallish voice nicely colored toward the dark side, was the touching Lisa; soprano Suzanna Poretzky, a recent winner in the Domingo-sponsored Operalia competition, offered a delightful take on her one big aria. The evening’s loudest, longest cheers, however, went to the veteran (64) Elena Obraztsova, who is allotted little actually to sing about in the opera  but whose silent enactment of her death scene – starkly punctuated in Pilz’s production by the fall of her cane onto the resonant floor – was one of the evening’s breath-stopping moments.
A brilliant beginning, therefore, and a promising one.The season continues with next week’s “Lohengrin” – again, healing the company’s previous short shrift accorded to Wagner – and moves onward through an admirable variety of offerings. The musical range is spectacular, from the seductive strains of Lehar’s evergreen “Merry Widow” to the twelve-tone asperities of Schoenberg’s “Moses und Aron” to the curious phenomenon of a staged version of Bach’s churchly B-Minor Mass.  So far, so good.

Posted in Musical America | Comments Off on Pick Dam

The Annual Mozart Love Letter

Mozart’s music didn‘t merely fill the Hollywood Bowl last week; it fulfilled it. The vast space, in which the banalities of Rachmaninoff, etc., rattled around (to the delight of some) on other weeks this summer, seemed exactly the right size for the two programs of profuse small miracles conducted by Peter Oundjian. The Philharmonic itself was reduced to proper Mozartian size; the empty spaces on the stage where trombones, bass drum and cymbals are deployed in repertory of — I want to say lesser here, but that would stir up the letter writers — different states of mind were filled for these two concerts with a row of potted greenery, very nice. Both concerts drew audiences in the seven-thousands, considerably above the average on ”classical“ nights at the Bowl. There’s hope for us yet.

Oundjian, the second Canadian conductor at the Bowl in two weeks, is best-known for his many years as first violinist with the Tokyo String Quartet; now he has caught the baton bug, and the years of chamber music, of attending to the give-and-take and all the other subtleties associated with that repertory, came through in his orchestral leadership as well. Some poor microphoning — a common affliction this summer at almost every Bowl concert I‘ve attended — undermined the small-scale effects he was obviously trying for, although the balance on the second concert was distinctly better. Also to Oundjian’s credit was his faithful attention to Mozart‘s prescribed repeats in the sonata-form movements of the three symphonies he conducted — Nos. 29 and 38 (”The Prague“) on Tuesday, No. 41 (”The Jupiter“) on Thursday. Helene Grimaud was the tense, wonderfully driven soloist in the D-minor Piano Concerto on Tuesday. Julia Fischer, the latest in an apparently inexhaustible inventory of teenage violinists from here and abroad, skated across the notes, but not the music, of the Fourth Violin Concerto on Thursday.

Miracles; I’ve used the word, and I‘ll stay with it. In a lifetime with Mozart’s music I am still surprised, shaken, momentarily ashiver at those moments when the heavens seem to part and revelations fill the sky. There is one in the slow movement of the concerto that Grimaud played, when the pianist, alone over a quiet accompanying throb, plays a one-finger melody: pure, radiant, lovable, the song that Susanna might sing once her marriage to Figaro is finally assured. Another comes only three or four minutes later, when the fearsome outburst that suddenly erupted subsides just as suddenly. Mozart has tightened the emotional screws; now the momentum gradually slackens and the tune itself seems to disintegrate. Like a race-car driver downshifting, the notes gradually lengthen; 16ths become eighths become quarters, and then we‘re somewhere else in the music. Very slippery, wonderfully imaginative.

The Symphony No. 29 began the Tuesday concert, music from Mozart’s feisty adolescence but with its own share of strange and wonderful events that the Bowl performance nicely brought forward. There‘s a manic quality in the orchestration; it comes mostly from the way Mozart uses the horns. In A major, the key of this work, the horns spend a lot of time on the red-hot high E, the dominant note. This is the same curdling note that Beethoven later used, to the same effect, in his Seventh Symphony (which is also in A major); Mozart, with splendid help last week from the Philharmonic’s Jerry Folsom, got there first.

Two nights later came ”The Jupiter,“ with its own catalog of miracles. Just the opening is astounding enough, the ”him and her“ conversation that constitutes the opening theme, the great bluster as the full orchestra takes over, a reprise of that initial conversation but now subdued, wistful, wound around with gorgeous commentary from the winds. Has anyone done an accurate count of the number of separate tunes in that first movement, strung out in nonstop concatenation, rising, falling, capturing our ability to breathe? To me, however, the apocalyptic moment in ”The Jupiter“ comes somewhat later, just beyond the midpoint of the sublime, deeply affecting slow movement. The ever-so-slightly disturbed opening music has been explored and turned upon itself; its harmonies, moving with some sense of terror through minor keys, lead us finally to the point where we might expect the return of the first theme to round out the grand design. Mozart provides an extraordinary bridge to that expected return; flute and oboe twist around one another, creating harmonies so poignant as to cause actual pain. It‘s a small moment; it goes by quickly, so that you experience it in a kind of double take. Once you’ve absorbed ”The Jupiter“ into your own bloodstream, you learn to wait for that moment, and to experience the pain every time.

Three years after Mozart‘s death, his widow, Constanze, arranged a memorial concert, and the 24-year-old Ludwig van Beethoven, newly arrived in Vienna and already launched as music’s latest conqueror, was invited to perform the D-minor Concerto. It apparently affected him strongly; it doesn‘t stretch a point to suggest that the D-minor clouds and murk that open Mozart’s concerto may have foreshadowed the D-minor clouds and murk at the start of Beethoven‘s Ninth Symphony 30 years later. At the concerto performance, Beethoven had improvised a cadenza; he later wrote it down and presented it to Constanze. It consists of five minutes of extraordinary, disturbing, difficult, revelatory music, and its further value is, of course, as a document of one supreme composer’s take on another. On my rather large Mozart shelf, the only recording of that concerto that uses Beethoven‘s cadenza — and it’s a superb one — is by Mitsuko Uchida.

Grimaud used that cadenza in her Bowl performance; it accorded very well with her overall conception of the work: strong, forthright, dramatic, fully responsive to the music‘s D-minorness — the key, after all, of Don Giovanni’s descent to Hell. Grimaud‘s last appearance at the Bowl had been sabotaged by video cameramen wandering around onstage and distracting her (as the screen clearly showed). This time she — and Mozart — were fully in charge.

Posted in A Little Night Music | Comments Off on The Annual Mozart Love Letter